|
Endangered Sites Press Conference
Remarks
July 2, 2003
Wayne Goldstein President, Montgomery Preservation, Inc.

Welcome to the release of Montgomery Preservation's Eleven Most
Endangered Sites in Montgomery County. Silver Spring, Rockville, and
Germantown are each represented with three entries, and Sandy Spring and
Beallsville each have one. Five are threatened with demolition; five are
threatened with demolition-by-neglect; and one is threatened with major
alterations.
We were torn about where to hold the press conference. The property
that is at greatest risk for imminent demolition is the Silver Spring
Little Tavern. However, MPI and the Silver Spring Historical Society have
recently nominated it to the county Locational
Atlas. We are quite optimistic that we will be successful because the
Bethesda Little Tavern is already on the county's Master Plan for
Historic Preservation.
This is why we chose Park Street Elementary School as the site of this
year's press conference. Park Street School is to be demolished in two
years. By increasing people's awarenesss of the
stature of the architect and the place of this building in his body of
work, we hope to persuade the community, the City, and Montgomery County
Public Schools (MCPS) to rally around the reuse of the original building
as a part of the new Richard Montgomery High School. There is enough time
to redo plans to allow for the creative reuse of this architecturally
important structure.
Montgomery Preservation has been contacted by an individual who loves
log buildings and who wants to restore and reuse the Black Rock Log
House, and we have been trying to work with the owner of this site, Clear
Channel Communications, to persuade them to work with Montgomery
Preservation and this individual.
Progress continues to be made on another property, the Spates
Bungalow.
A year ago, Montgomery Preservation outlined the twin threats to Jessup Blair
Park caused by the historically
and environmentally destructive plans for the Park by Montgomery College
and the Montgomery Parks Department. Since then, most of the threat
caused by the college has been eliminated, although Montgomery
Preservation remains concerned with how the College builds its bridge and
connecting walkway in the park even as we await the results of the court
appeal related to this issue. We are very concerned with the plans of the
Parks Department, which promises to move parking and remove pavement to
improve the historic and natural setting, even as it proposes new parking
and paving to further threaten the same historic and natural setting. We
will encourage the Historic Preservation Commission to be skeptical of
grandiose plans that do more to replicate past mistakes than to solve
them.
While we don't have the same detailed level of knowledge about all
eleven sites, we can refer you to those who can tell you more about the
other sites. Montgomery Preservation aspires to one day be able to
actively pursue advocacy for each of the eleven sites chosen for its
list.

|